Proposal 2019/1 posited the creation of a new U/B 214 field for separate statements forproduction, publication, distribution, and manufacture, corresponding to MARC 21 Bibliographicfield 264. Proposal 2019/2 took the route of altering the existing U/B 210 to accommodate thegreater detail called for in the IFLA LRM. Changes to the proposed U/B 214 include:*Move the second paragraph of the U/B 214 definition (“Information in field 214 ...”)down to the Notes on Field Contents section.

* Ms. Manneheut (Action: Ms. Manneheut) will provide instructions for using Move the second paragraph of the U/B 214for older monographic publications to add definition (“Information in field 214 ...”) down to the Notes on Field Contentssection.

*The section entitled “Alternative Ms. Manneheut (Action: Ms. Manneheut) will provide instructions for Parallel Data” and using U/B 214 for older monographic publications to add to the corresponding Example 9Alternative were deletedNotes on Field Contents.

*Subfield $d definition changed to “Date of publication, production, distribution,manufacture, or copyrightThe section entitled “Alternative for Parallel Data” and the corresponding Example 9 Alternative were deleted.”

*In the Subfield $d definition for U/B 210changed to “Date of publication, add the statement “Fields 210 and 214 should not be usedin the same recordproduction, distribution, manufacture, or copyright.”

*In the definition for U/B 210, add the statement “Fields 210 and 214 should not be used in the same record.” After discussing the two alternative proposals, 2019/1 for the new field U/B 214 was acceptedand 2019/2 for further work to expand field U/.B 210 was rejected.